On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 13:58, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 13:35, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>> looking at the example, it seems here is such an issue with > the "canonization status"=catholic saint. Why do the individual > saints not have the property, but the group has it? > if there is a property shared by all members of a group then it MUST be > marked on > the group ALONE and not also on individual members. This is not the rule on Wikidata. > DRY (don't repeat yourself) is rigidly enforced. It is not, especially in cases like the above. > Yes, I've been bitten by this before. Marking up Wikimedia images as being > listed > buildings. All went fine until I happened to mark a few that were collected > in a group > of "Listed buildings in <Location>." Those changes were reverted because the > grouping itself was flagged as being of listed buildings. Do you mean categories on Wikimedia Commons? That's not Wikidata. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
