I'd recommend trying to eliminate the parenthesis, because it would be easier to understand if it can be read straight through.
Also, I don't quite understand the last phrase: > "because only the rightholders are given permission based on individual > discretion." Who are the "rightholders"? Who is the individual who uses discretion? On 4/11/19, Szem <szembiket...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've written a definition for access=permit: > > permit > > > > Use is subject to prior authorization (eg written, photo, other), in the > absence of which the use (entry) may be denied. Permission (which may > only apply to certain transportation mode: bicycle, foot, etc.) is not > granted on the basis of individual assessment but can be obtained by > anyone. This is the difference of substance between private and permit, > because only the rightholders are given permission based on individual > discretion. > > Could you check it out because it was created with the help of Google > translator. > > 2019.04.11. 15:03 keltezéssel, Paul Allen írta: >> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 13:41, Rory McCann <r...@technomancy.org >> <mailto:r...@technomancy.org>> wrote: >> >> On 10/04/2019 14:28, Paul Allen wrote: >> > You may want to take Peachtree City, Georgia into account in your >> > proposal. It has an alternative transportation network of golf >> cart >> > paths. People must obtain and display permits on their carts to >> use >> > the paths. Accordingly, somebody has tagged several footpaths >> there >> > with golf_cart=permissive. >> I thought "*=permissive" meant: "You have no legal right use that on >> this road/path/etc, someone else 'owns'/controls it. However they >> allow >> anyone to use it by default, but they reserve the right to kick you >> out/off for any reason." And that doesn't sound like what you >> describe. >> >> >> You are absolutely correct. However, access=permit was only agreed >> upon in the last >> couple of months whereas those tags were added prior to that approval and >> access=permissive was the best fit back then. I should have made it >> clearer I was >> describing what had been tagged and not endorsing what had been done. >> Actually, >> I only remembered access=permit after I'd sent that mail. >> >> It seems like this permit system gives someone a (temporary) >> _right_ to >> drive their golf cart along those paths. I think >> `golf_cart=permit` is >> more accurate here. >> >> >> I'd agree with you there. Certainly if I were mapping it now I'd use >> access=permit. I'd >> hesitate to change the existing tags without first contacting the >> original mapper. Which I shall >> leave to somebody else who feels like taking on that particular exercise. >> >> -- >> Paul >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
