On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 16:32, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 10. Apr 2019, at 14:28, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > People must obtain and display permits > > on their carts to use the paths. Accordingly, somebody has tagged > several footpaths there > > with golf_cart=permissive. > > that’s definitely not „permissive“, I agree. But I didn't tag it, I just pointed out how it had been tagged. > it’s either „yes“, „designated“ or maybe „private“ (if you need a > „special“ permission the standard tag is private). If you need a general > license for golf carts, tagging it would be like tagging that you need a > driving permit to drive a car. > It is along the lines of a driving licence, but not exactly the same (as I understand it). Which means it should probably be access=permit (discussed here a few months ago). It's not like access for cars (you're in a car, you have a driving licence, access is permitted). It's not like access for bicycles (you're on a bicycle, you don't need a licence, access is permitted). You can drive a golf cart along what are essentially wide footpaths IF you have a permit. You can't drive to the city in a low-loader ferrying a golf cart, unload the golf cart and just drive it along those paths with impunity, you have to get a permit or risk a fine. For more info, follow the links I gave previously. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
