The question asked is "Is this street accessible for pedestrians here?". It doesn't ask for the user's opinion on how safe it is.
Also: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-February/042874.html On 14/02/2019 22:10, Volker Schmidt wrote: > I am sorry, this is not the correct approach. We have here plenty of > streets in other categories (unclassified|teritery|secondary|primary) > without sidewalk where it is perfectly legal for pedestrians to use the > road. This does not say whether it's safe to walk on them. If people now > start putting foot=no because they want to prevent people from walking > on the these roads because it's unsafe, then we create a nice mess. You > should map the deviation from the default (foot=no), not confirm a > default (foot=yes). _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
