I agree that it would make sense to not ask whether a road has a sidewalk outside of built-up areas because in most cases, it will have no sidewalks.
Regrettably, whether a road is in a built-up area or outside is not an information that is recorded in OSM. Tobias On 14/02/2019 18:23, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 14. Feb 2019, at 16:05, Rory McCann <r...@technomancy.org> wrote: >> >> But in Ireland (& I think UK), all public roads except motorways, are >> foot=yes. Legally you can walk on the road, even if there is not footpath >> ("sidewalk"). I think this adds bloat and quests which will annoy mappers. > > > Germany and Italy as well (motorroads and motorways excluded). > Sooner or later we might add sidewalk=no tags to many roads in the > countryside (maybe, so long I wasn’t actually doing it). There may be a > fundamental conflict of the StreetComplete project (which encourages to > verify everything) and our usually sloppy way of assuming defaults. Problem > is with lots of “boring” tags on every object, we’ll loose focus/overview and > it might reduce data quality rather than augmenting it. I acknowledge some > compromise is already offered by asking only for roads without sidewalks, but > it is still too many, if it were only in built-up areas it would be probably > acceptable (for Italy or Germany). > > Cheers, Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging