Tracks are often "access=private" for everyone, so there's no reason to call out foot access in particular.
-- Mark On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 19:27:44 +0000 Dave F via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > Why do you exclude tracks? > Legal access to them are often denied as they're on private land > (example: farms) > > Why ford? > Why oneway? > > Cheers > DaveF > > On 15/02/2019 11:50, Tobias Wrede wrote: > > As far as I am concerned roads that are most likely to merit a > > foot=no are > > > > - all highway road types except tracks and except where foot=no is > > regionally implied > > > > - where there is no sidewalk > > > > any that have one of: > > - bridge=yes > > - tunnel=yes > > - ford=yes > > - oneway=yes > > - bicycle=no/private/... > > - bicycle_road=yes (?) Not sure if there are countries where a > > bicycle_road would forbit foot traffic in absence of sidewalks > > > > you could also exclude highways that are part of a hiking route > > (might be difficult with relations and might overdo it). > > > > lit=* is to fuzzy in my opinion to be useful. > > > > Tobias > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
