Is this now about the word "legal" or about the negation of the question? What difference does the latter make? Also, doesn't "probited" imply "legally" in common understanding?
And of course, foot=no is tagged if a road is not accessible by foot. On February 15, 2019 12:52:16 AM GMT+01:00, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The question asked is "Is this street accessible for pedestrians >here?". >> It doesn't ask for the user's opinion on how safe it is. >> > >I believe this is the wrong question. It should be “Are pedestrians >legally >prohibited from walking along this road?” > >If so, use foot=no > >Foot=yes should only be used for motorways and motorway_link roads, >bridleways and cycleways. > >(and perhaps busways, railways? Though I can’t think of any that would >allow pedestrian travel) > >If the road is tagged expressway=yes then foot=yes might also be >needed. >All other classifications of road should be presumed to permit >pedestrian >travel. > > >> _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
