Re: marking= zebra Problem is that the zebra stripes can have different meaning in different countries. In Italy it can mean, depending on the context: "foot-only" or "foot-and-bicycle". In addition we also have additional non-zebra signing for bicycles. It would be much better to distinguish between "marked" and "unmarked" for the horizontal signalling, without specifying the signalling details and use foot=yes|no and bicycle=yes|no|dismount (?) to indicate the type of traffic that can cross.
Re: precedence of vertical signalling over horizontal signalling I am not sure about this here in Italy and even less so in other countries. We do have here many crossings that consist only of painted zebra stripes on the ground without any vertical sign. Re: Zebra markings with traffic lights This standard in Italy. In Germany the standard for that looks different: two rows of dashed white stripes (may we should call that Okapi), but the meaning is the same. On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 11:35, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am Fr., 26. Okt. 2018 um 11:30 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny < > matkoni...@tutanota.com>: > >> Am Fr., 26. Okt. 2018 um 11:12 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny < >> matkoni...@tutanota.com>: >> >> In general crossing tag is attempting to tag several different things >>> >>> at once - for example how I am supposed to tag crossing with island, >>> >>> traffic lights and zebra markings in Poland? >>> >> >> >> in the simplest case (dual carriageway connected with traffic lights), >> you could tag them like this: >> >> footway connecting the dual carriageway. >> >> start and end node: >> highway=crossing >> crossing=traffic_signals >> >> >> Not on nodes shared by road and footway? >> > > > it is the same (see the assumption above). If sidewalks are mapped, the > better description would indeed have been intersection of road with > sidewalk. > > >> >> >> on the way: >> highway=footway >> footway=crossing >> crossing=traffic_island >> >> >> Tagging way crossing=traffic_island and nodes crossing=traffic_signals is >> >> deeply not obvious. >> > > as I wrote, you could limit this to the part on the island. > > Cheers, > Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
