On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 21:16 +0200, Tobias Zwick wrote: > This is a good argument against tagging an explicit maxspeed=X when > there is actually no speed limit sign around (X is what the OSM > mapper > by his knowledge about the law thinks should be the default limit > here). > > Unfortunately, this is still common practice because of the lack of a > scheme for tagging explicitly that the maxspeed is not signed.
If we went to that extreme, we would have very few speed limits mapped in Europe. Phil (trigpoint > > > On 19/09/2018 09:47, Philip Barnes wrote: > > And if the default actually applies, or has it been overriden by > > local > > signage. > > > > I am not convinced that a default limit helps, if no speed limit > > has > > been surveyed I would prefer that box not to be displayed in my > > app. > > a. It will not give me wrong and possibly costly information. > > b. It makes it obvious that I should survey and map the limit. > > > > Phil (trigpoint) > > > > On 19 September 2018 07:10:27 BST, Graeme Fitzpatrick > > <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 13:30, Joseph Eisenberg > > <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com <mailto:joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > So on the boundary=administrative admin_level=6 for Rogers > > County, we could have something like > > maxspeed:type:default=45mph > > > > > > Just after crossing over the border into the state of > > Queensland, > > you have this > > sign: https://www.google.com/maps/@-28.1592952,153.4932922,3a,7 > > 5y,288.32h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXT0hBPanAoGnfz9N- > > Ugbyw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 > > <https://www.google.com/maps/@-28.1592952,153.4932922,3a,75y,28 > > 8.32h,90t/data=%213m6%211e1%213m4%211sXT0hBPanAoGnfz9N- > > Ugbyw%212e0%217i13312%218i6656> > > (Incidentally, I think 7 of the 8 Australian states & > > territories > > have the same limits?) > > > > I understand (I think!) that your system would set this as a > > default > > for all Qld roads? > > > > But based on what? How does OSM know that this stretch of road > > is in > > either a rural or a built-up area? > > > > Thanks > > > > Graeme > > > > > > -- > > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my > > brevity. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging