> On Jan 16, 2018, at 9:43 AM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 16, 2018 05:36, "Stefan Nagy" <stefan.n...@posteo.net 
> <mailto:stefan.n...@posteo.net>> wrote:
> Am 16.01.2018 12:10 schrieb marc marc:
> we probably need to work on "default values".
> but no one seems motivated to work on the proposal.
> 
> Is 'default values' a better word for what I called 'implicit values'
> before or are you talking about something else?
> 
> That's how I read it.  Would be handy for situations that frequently come up, 
> like the speed limit of an area unless otherwise posted being a specific 
> value, or like U turns being blanket banned anywhere with a traffic light in 
> the City of Tulsa and State of Oregon.

I think I’ve seen the question of setting defaults come up several times on 
this list and never get traction. I personally think they’d be a good thing to 
simplify tagging.

Just yesterday I felt obligated when putting a maxspeed tag on some residential 
streets resorted to also adding a source:maxspeed="California vehicle code 
22352”. Paragraph 22352 in the California vehicle code indicates, among other 
things, that a unsigned a residential street has a 25 mph speed limit. It would 
be much easier and more encompassing to be able to add a tag to the boundary 
relation for California to indicate the default speeds for various highway 
classes in the state. Not a big deal for motorways as there are only a few tens 
of thousands of miles of those, but there has to millions of miles of 
residential roads in California with many (most?) being unsigned. But being 
unsigned won’t stop you from getting a ticket for exceeding the prima facia 
speed limit so routers and navigation guidance applications ought to know about 
it.

I’d suggest something like default:* added to boundary relations. But that 
doesn’t really work for speed limits as you also need to specify the highway 
type. And I don’t see how that might work in your example of blanket 
prohibition of U turns.

Maybe an interested small group could work off the tagging list to come up with 
a proposal on how jurisdictional defaults could be tagged. Once the worst of 
the defects in the scheme were fixed it could then be brought back to this list 
to be bike shedded to death.


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to