On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:36 PM, marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Le 03. 01. 18 à 00:26, Warin a écrit : > > At present decaying features look to have the following progression for > me; > > you miss some. > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix > > > ruin: no wiki documented - where a totally new feature build would be > > cheaper than a rebuild. > > found 0 occurrence of ruin: > it is a problem ruined: <> ruins: (taginfo show that ruins: are more > often than ruined: but having one documented namespace should be better) > > > raised: no wiki documented - where most of the feature has been removed, > > so little remains that it is hard to distinguish. > > found 0 occurrence of raised: > it's not enough to have demolished: ? > I only found raised without namespace (bad idea because all tools need > to check this tag to known that the feature is fact doesn't exist) > This tagging puzzles me. 'Razed' is an English synonym for 'demolished.' 'Raised', on the other hand is 'lifted up', and can be used to mean 'built.' I don't understand what the difference between 'razed' (if such a beast exists) and 'demolished' is supposed to be. 'raised' is a tag that I would find too ambiguous: it could mean that the building is raised (on an elevated foundation), was raised (built) on a particular date, or one of several other things, but would never mean 'demolished.'
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
