On 19-Sep-17 09:54 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 19-Sep-17 03:56 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
The real-life sign says, "Access by permit only, for information
contact..." and that's what I propose to map!
Yep.
I think the important thing is the contact information - this is
where the detail of what is required can be obtained rather than
having those details in OSM.
It is the details that vary a lot from place to place and maybe
too varied around the world for renders to be bothered with. It
might just change from time to time, rather not have the dynamic
stuff on OSM?
So access=permit with permit_contact:web/email/phone/*=* ???
Would that be a compromise 'we' can all use?
You mean, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424226491 (and all
the other parcels from that import
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import:_NYCDEP_Watershed_Recreation_Areas>)?
It's already there. At least on everything that I've ever tagged with
*=permit. So there's zero additional work for me in complying with
your request. :)
My comments are not a request, but a suggestion. Hence the question marks.
I don't think the tagging on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424226491
goes far enough.
There is no specific contact information for a permit.
Not all permits come from the land owners/controllers some come from
another body e.g. Kokoda Track.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
