On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19-Sep-17 03:56 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > > The real-life sign says, "Access by permit only, for information > contact..." and that's what I propose to map! > > Yep. > I think the important thing is the contact information - this is where the > detail of what is required can be obtained rather than having those details > in OSM. > It is the details that vary a lot from place to place and maybe too varied > around the world for renders to be bothered with. It might just change from > time to time, rather not have the dynamic stuff on OSM? > > So access=permit with permit_contact:web/email/phone/*=* ??? > Would that be a compromise 'we' can all use? > You mean, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424226491 (and all the other parcels from that import <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import:_NYCDEP_Watershed_Recreation_Areas> )? It's already there. At least on everything that I've ever tagged with *=permit. So there's zero additional work for me in complying with your request. :) Incidentally, every few months I scrape http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/pdf/recreation/open_rec_areas.pdf and update the areas. I see that the current file is newer than what's in OSM, so I've got another item on the 'to do' list. Oh well, it's usually a fairly quick job, since I managed to automate scraping the parcel boundaries out of the PDF's.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
