I think you are overreaching a bit on this. For one thing, not all forests are for wood production - rubber tree plantations for example are for extracting sap from trees.
Natural=wood seems perfectly correct to me for stands of trees in a more or less "natural" state whereas landcover=trees implies, at least to me, an area with planted trees that are not being used for sap, or lumber, etc., but more for their decorative or shading effect. What's your motivation do do this? Dave <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 7:49 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27/12/2015 00:43, Warin wrote: > >> Hi, >> The present multiple applications landuse=forest has me thinking that a >> new tag of >> >> landuse=forestry >> >> maybe best to focus this new tag onto a specific forest use - that of >> wood production. >> >> > For info, I have used that (once!): > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370079612 > > Rendering >> The rendering of landuse=forestry should incorporate a brown axe onto the >> original forest rendering to show that it is for wood production. >> >> > I've not tried rendering it though. > > Cheers, > > Andy > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
