Hi,
The present multiple applications landuse=forest has me thinking that a new tag of

landuse=forestry

maybe best to focus this new tag onto a specific forest use - that of wood production.

In the longer term the tag landuse=forest can eventually be depreciated .. people can migrate the older tagged things into

Use;
landuse=forestry  for wood producing areas
leisure=nature_reserve for areas of nature preservation
natural=wood for areas covered with trees not used

(Personally I'd like to see all these incorporated into the landuse key. landuse=nature_reserve and landuse=none (where there is no active use.. even for preservation))

Cover/presence;
landcover=trees for areas covered with trees


Rendering
The rendering of landuse=forestry should incorporate a brown axe onto the original forest rendering to show that it is for wood production.


------------------
Mappers who simply come across an areas with trees (satellite of survey) can simply tag landcover=trees. At present they tend to tag landuse=forest. By making the choice landuse=forestry it should increase the correct choice. This way they tag the truth - landcover=trees. The detail of what it gets used for can come later.


? Comments ?
Yes I am also pushing the landcover key with the value trees ... looks to be the right choice to me.

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to