Hi everyone, Just my 2 cents : Traffic_sign=electronic_display Location=overhead Operator=*
The variable function may be included inside the electronic_display value of traffic_sign As an overhead feature, it should be member of the highway feature it is placed upon of. Cheers Le 31 oct. 2015 4:06 PM, "Gerd Petermann" <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> a écrit : > I think we have divide this into two points: > > 1) how do we map the position "overhead"? I found location=overhead is > used ~ 2500 times. > > 2) I guess we all associate the "electronic display" with something > similar to a computer monitor, > > which is programmable, but if I got that right, there are also less > "flexible" traffic_signs which can > > only show a limited number of different sysmbols by flipping small > coloured elements, still that are > > probably controlled by electronic components. > > I guess we don't care much about this difference. > > The interesting part is that the information on the sign can change, > > so I think > > traffic_sign=changing > > or > > traffic_sign=variable > > are both okay, don't know which one is less confusing. > > > > ------------------------------ > *Von:* John Eldredge <j...@jfeldredge.com> > *Gesendet:* Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 15:49 > *An:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > *Betreff:* Re: [Tagging] How to tag a "overhead electronic display" ? > > > We have generally avoided the use of acronyms in tagging. Most people, > including me, wouldn't recognize the meaning of sign=pcms upon seeing it. > > -- > John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com > "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot > drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr. > > On October 29, 2015 3:49:25 AM Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > >> I think we'd have to invent a tag. I only know them to be called a >> "programmable changeable message sign", so I'd probably tag it >> traffic_sign=pcms >> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Gerd Petermann < >> gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Please see >>> >>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31846954 >>> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31846954> >>> OpenStreetMap >>> Weitere Informationen... >>> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31846954> >>> >>> >>> Any ideas (which do not invent a new highway tag)? >>> >>> >>> Gerd >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
