> Am 29.05.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl>: > > Sure, I know it. But it would mean that building=church is rather just a > building form, not the "amenity" in any way, as suggested. Then if we also > make building=industrial + man_made=works, it's kind of logical, because > building=industrial would mean "industrial buildings which are no longer in > use as works", which of course exist (be it a loft, office, ruins, or just > disused buildings) and we may indicate it this way. yes, we do this. Actually most do building=yes You could also tag building=shop_floor or building=storehouse building=foundry ... cheers Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
- [Tagging] man_made=works (was: Re: Removal of "a... Daniel Koć
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works (was: Re: Removal of &quo... pmailkeey .
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Daniel Koć
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Arch Arch
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Daniel Koć
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works John Willis
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works John Eldredge
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works John Willis
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works pmailkeey .
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works pmailkeey .
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works pmailkeey .
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Warin
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Marc Gemis
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works pmailkeey .
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works pmailkeey .
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Daniel Koć
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Martin Koppenhoefer