On 29 May 2015 at 12:42, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote: > W dniu 29.05.2015 13:34, John Willis napisał(a): > > I know there is a way to tag what the building as to what it was >> initially used for - but i don't think that is the proper way (afaik). >> > > So what do you think about building=church + amenity=museum then? > > I think we need some clear, general rules. Current system is horrible in > this matter, but I'd like it to be at least a bit coherent. > > building=museum.
A museum is no more an amenity than a house is. -- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
