> Am 31.05.2015 um 13:09 schrieb Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl>: > > . It is so frustrating, that I rather try to propose more coherent (even if > not standard) solutions that's fine but they should be compatible with the existing scheme (i e use different keys so that it can be applied in parallel), and you should point out (as you do AFAIR) that these are suggestions and not the established scheme cheers Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works pmailkeey .
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works pmailkeey .
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Warin
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Marc Gemis
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works pmailkeey .
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works pmailkeey .
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Daniel Koć
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Marc Gemis
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Daniel Koć
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Warin
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Marc Gemis
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Daniel Koć
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Daniel Koć
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Marc Gemis
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Daniel Koć
- Re: [Tagging] man_made=works Martin Koppenhoefer