Am 29.05.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Daniel Koć:
W dniu 29.05.2015 13:47, pmailkeey . napisał(a):
On 29 May 2015 at 12:42, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote:
W dniu 29.05.2015 13:34, John Willis napisał(a):
I know there is a way to tag what the building as to what it was
initially used for - but i don't think that is the proper way
(afaik).
So what do you think about building=church + amenity=museum then?
I think we need some clear, general rules. Current system is
horrible in this matter, but I'd like it to be at least a bit
coherent.
building=museum.
A museum is no more an amenity than a house is.
So why do we use building=church + amenity=place_of_worship?
There do exist church buildings which are no longer in use as place of
worships. Those can be tagged with building=church without
amenity=place_of_worship
See:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship#Architectural_style_of_buildings_for_worshipping
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
