On 6 May 2015 at 11:46, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2015-05-06 12:41 GMT+02:00 <p...@trigpoint.me.uk>: > >> One of the biggest issues I see is that the mapper has to choose between >> tourism=caravan_site and tourism=campsite, when the vast majority of >> commercial sites cater for both. > > > > this is a non-issue, simply tag everything as tourism=camp_site and > eventually add caravan=yes/no, and use tourism=caravan_site for > caravan-only sites. > > -1 That's '-ist' - we should aim for something equal such as: Tourism=site caravan=yes tents=yes static=yes RV=yes [=motorhome] swimming_pool=yes [etc. inc. other facility=*] I know a few local tourism sites where the tourist brings only themselves and rents a static caravan. How should they be tagged ? The main tag should not favour type at all but type tags should be added as necessary in whatever combination is appropriate -- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
