On 06.02.2015 12:16, Dan S wrote: > However it occurs to me that it would be useful to have some way of > indicating _what_ it is the reception for. For example, if it was part > of a "site" relation*, then a role like role=reception would connect > it to the larger entity in a meaningful way. That might be a suggested > tagging option...
I believe this is not necessary as long as the reception is contained in only one outline of a relevant feature (hotel, motel etc.), which will cover almost all cases. Of course, for the special cases you could use a relation, but that should be limited to those cases. What I consider a bit odd, by the way, is the amenity key. Receptions are usually not amenities by themselves, but instead part of an amenity. Perhaps a new key for this kind of sub-feature would be in order? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
