On February 7, 2015 10:41:17 AM CST, Kotya Karapetyan <kotya.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Amenity is the best fit for this tag. > > > > > > I disagree. (Usually that just means "I didn't find anything > better") > > +1 > "Amenity" is very vague in general (), and a lot of things can be > marked as such. So I'd prefer to use it only when it's an obvious > choice or there is nothing better. > What about using "office"? > I was also surprised to discover that there was not key for "booth" in > OSM. (And of course all currently available booths ended in "amenity" > :) ) Shall we maybe introduce it? > > > As > > this tag is always going to be used within another entity I think we > should > > rather look towards something like indoor tagging or other subtags. > In > > addition using amenity for reception desk would for example prevent > you from > > placing it on the node of the amenity and use one node for both. > > Not to defend the amenity key, but I wonder if there is a need to tag > the reception if the whole object (including the reception) deserves > just a single node. > > Cheers, > Kotya > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I suspect what was meant was an amenity node contained within a larger entity that was mapped as something other than amenity. -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
