fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com> writes: > Having been away from this for a bit, I would propose: > > Add a landuse=reservoir_protection (or some other name, not in use) to > be for the landuse of a parcel that is used for containing a reservoir > and protection zones. (I have an attitude that landuse will often > align with parcel boundaries.)
There are already protected areas under boundary [1]. So reservoirs would be class eleven or 15. This is perhaps not really the right place to discuss, but I think boundary=protected_area is off. The basic issue is that we (I) are trying to denote landuse, not boundary. Rendering the inside of a boundary as an area just seems incorrect to me; boundaries are linear features. And "protected_area" is a kitchen sink concept. > I was looking for a more tight definition of landuse=reservoir which > would not include the whole flooding area but the area which primary use > is the reservoir including the water, the dam and any facility like a > tool shed. I think this is the crux of the issue. I am referring to reservoirs which are hard to tell from lakes, other than the "public water supply - no trespassing" signs.
pgpvxuCRTeBBq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
