Am 07.06.2013 16:20, schrieb René Kirchhoff: > I want to call a few facts in mind: > > - We have an old attribute "landuse = reservoir". This is very much in use. > - We have a proposal "Water detail". This was approved in voting by a > large majority.
16:3 is a poor result for voting activity > This proposal includes: > waterway=riverbank (replaced by natural=water + water=river) > landuse=reservoir (replaced by natural=water + water=reservoir) > landuse=pond (replaced by natural=water + water=pond) > and: > Until all renderers (which render those areas differently from > natural=water) support those new values, both schemes can be used > together: just add natural=water and water=* to already present tags. > "Deprecates" means "is equivalent for all purposes to". For example, > landuse=reservoir should be rendered exactly like natural=water + > water=reservoir. There are too many uses of the current tagging scheme, > and we don't want massive retagging and edit wars. > > > Many users have decided together for this new approach. > This result should be respected by all of us. > Finally, it was at that time already been discussed extensively over the > content. That is not what taginfo presents. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=water#values > Why do we resist again bring this discussion now? The proposal is unique > and clearly understandable. The desire of the community should follow, > and document decisions made in the wiki accordingly. This also means > that there is a successor to landuse=reservoir. There where unanswered questions on this list and no real discussion. I only find: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap.tagging/7247/focus=7309 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap.tagging/8547/focus=8556 Can someone please show me the conclusion on this list as I do not find it. > My assumption was that you know the decision of the community. > Apparently this is not so, otherwise this discussion would not be necessary. That is exactly the point. What is the community for you. I would always discuss these major edits prior on this list. The numbers on taginfo lead to a different view: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=reservoir http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/water=reservoir it is still 27:1 towards landuse=reservoir Once we get to a decision we need to change the wiki and also inform the developer of the editors as I only stumbled over this issue cause of: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/8759 cu fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
