Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> writes: > 2013/6/6 Toby Murray <toby.mur...@gmail.com> > >> We have gotten several notes reported from craigslist users saying "this >> lake is missing from the map" but I think it turns out that craigslist is >> not rendering landuse=reservoir so unless lakes have natural=water they >> don't show up on the CL maps. Just another rendering oddity I guess. > > If you agree that landuse=reservoir doesn't necessarily need to be water on > the whole area, then it seems logical to require a water-tag on the actual > water covered area to render "blue". As long as the main style puts so much > emphasis on landuse people will continue to map areas mainly with landuse > and use very less frequent the physical tags which are not rendered.
This essentially was the point I was trying to make: when humans see landuse=reservoir, they think it means different things 1) parcel containing protection zone and water, arguably to be shaded some light green natural/protected. should have water=reservoir on the actual water, to be blue 2) what is water=reservoir in 1, and thus should be blue That's why I suggested landuse=reservoir_protection instead, but that should include the water so it's not right etiher. I'm fine with landuse=reservoir, but then as always it needs to be clear and renderers need to catch up.
pgpcn4owKdZ11.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
