Am 08.06.2013 23:07, schrieb Greg Troxel: > fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com> writes: > >> But how to we proceed ? >> >> If we agree that landuse=reservoir should be used for the whole area. Do >> we need a temporary tag or adding water=reservoir to all of them? >> >> Only simple case are where a water=reservoir is already tagged (either >> on the same object or within one. > > Having been away from this for a bit, I would propose: > > Add a landuse=reservoir_protection (or some other name, not in use) to > be for the landuse of a parcel that is used for containing a reservoir > and protection zones. (I have an attitude that landuse will often > align with parcel boundaries.)
There are already protected areas under boundary [1]. So reservoirs would be class eleven or 15. > Let landuse=reservoir be deprecated, because it's confusing. > > Let water=reservoir be used, because it is not confusing. That tag > denots the fact that the area is a) water and b) a reservoir, which is > object tagging, not landuse tagging. > > > Does this make anyone significantly unhappy? I was looking for a more tight definition of landuse=reservoir which would not include the whole flooding area but the area which primary use is the reservoir including the water, the dam and any facility like a tool shed. cu fly --- [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=protected_area _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
