I think that the prefix "abandoned:" is what you refer to and "disused:" is your answer, eih?
- disused <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused>:*=* "features that* are in a reasonable state of repair but which are currently unused*" "The name is still relevant, and will still be searchable." - abandoned <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned>:*=* " features that have fallen into* serious disrepair and which could only be put back into operation with expensive effort*" "makes it unavailable to programs which locate shops, and unlikely to be displayed as a shop in any default renderings. The name is still relevant, and will still be searchable" This was the reasoning/logic in re-working the HDM tags<http://hot.openstreetmap.org/updates/2013-06-07_humanitarian_data_model_redux> (for the life-cycle/status part). Cheers, -Jaakko -- jaa...@helleranta.com * Skype: jhelleranta * Mobile: +509-37-269154 * http://go.hel.cc/about.me On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote: > We have a key "disused" (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused) > meant for things like abandoned railways or indefinitely locked car parks. > When used as directed the item will disappear from maps and be invisible > to rendering software. > > I'd like to discuss a tag for things that might need repair (more like > what http://seeclickfix.com/ does)/ > A way to tag a gate as not really working. Or a water fountain that is > still there, but empty. Or a drinking water > fountain that sprays you in the face but still delivers water. > > I've toyed with "stateofrepair" and "stateofrepair:note". Your thoughts? > > See also > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
