On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Dave F. <dave...@madasafish.com> wrote: > I'm fully entitled to disagree with you, especially when I've given clear > reasons for doing so. > > I've been polite to you in all communications. > > It is you that has solely been abusive. Not only to me, including private > correspondence, but also to others on this forum, who have clearly the best > interests of OSM at heart.
It's not only unpoliteness, but outright lying: On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 19:04 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: >> > The ground truth is the ways I flagged as bicycle=destination only >> > permit bicycles locally based on local signage in the Portland area. >> > Assumptions are not a substitute for having actual knowledge of the >> > area, quit editing based on assumptions. >> What's on the local signage? > > NO BICYCLES - EXCEPT LOCAL ACCESS _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
