On 09/08/2010 20:07, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:08:20 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Dave F.
<dave...@madasafish.com> wrote:
On 08/08/2010 20:40, Paul Johnson wrote:
The way I've been handling this is to stretch the limits of the
bicycle=destination tag; if it's more major than residential, open to
bicycles, but lacks shoulders and has narrow lanes or on-street
parking, then I tag it bicycle=destination (unless it qualifies for
cycleway=lane).
You seem to be misunderstanding the usage of bicycle=destination
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
down near the bottom.
I think he's trying to map for the impatient motorist.
Nope, mapping for accuracy.
Going on your mis-use of this tag - no, you're not.
Not only are you using the wrong tag, but you're tagging it based on
*your* opinion of whether you're *able* to cycle along a way.
You should be tagging either it's physical characteristics or whether
you're *allowed* to cycle along it.
Use tags such as shoulder=* to give an accurate description of the way
that allow individuals to decide if they think it's route they want to take.
You might want to take an extended break
from the project for a while since you seem to always know better than
every one else when you're wrong.
Judging from the tone of your most recent posts, it looks like you who
needs a break. Take deep breaths, & go for a walk.
Dave F.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
