On Fri, 20 August, 2010 10:00:36 AM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote:
> > And/Or maybe Nathan can give a few examples of ways which he feels you
> > have tagged incorrectly?
>
> Burnside Street: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/44706996
> (including adjacent ways extending from 2nd Avenue on the east to 24th
> Place on the west)
Thanks Nathan for the examples.
Paul, ORS 814.420 says "a person commits the offense of failure to use a bicycle
lane or path if the person operates a bicycle on any portion of a roadway that
is not a bicycle lane or bicycle path when a bicycle lane or bicycle path is
adjacent to or near the roadway" and then gives several exceptions.
If you are arguing that bicycle=destination applies to this portion of Burnside
Street as a result of ORS 814.420, then where is the adjacent bicycle lane or
bicycle path? Burnside Street is not tagged cycleway=track or cycleway=lane,
and
neither is there any way tagged highway=cycleway next to it.
And to pre-empt your answer: the parallel streets (Southwest Oak, Northwest
Couch) do not count. ORS 814.420 cannot be read as requiring cyclists to use
parallel streets since they are in no way "adjacent to or near the roadway" of
the street in question.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
