Regarding my cycleway=no_shoulder suggestion, here are a couple of example we see often in Quebec, where car and bicycle share the road without shoulders :
http://pistescyclables.ca/Evaluation/Signalisation/101_0706NotreDamedeMontauban.jpg http://pistescyclables.ca/Evaluation/Signalisation/101_0709.jpg Maybe these example should be coded as cycleway=designated ? > With about the same logic in mind, I > > could say cycleway=no_shoulder, meaning that that road is often used by > > cyclists and the traffic is low enough for a relatively safe sharing of > the > > road between car and bicycle even if there is pratically no shoulder (I > have > > an example of that near my home). > > I don't like that one. Traffic should be a separate tag. Along with > speed limit and number of lanes, that should be enough info for the > routers/renderers to make a reasonable decision (preferably with the > input of the end user). The problem with the subjective > cycleway=no_shoulder is simply that "relatively safe" differs from > person to person, and even from trip to trip. > Daniel Mon blog: http:\\daniel.art.over-blog.com Facebook: http://fr.facebook.com/people/Daniel_Tremblay/1323011538
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
