... That seems entirely sane ... Imho the most important thing is to map what's there on the ground ... If wonks like me want to add further information that they happen have available then that's fine too - but we're all volunteers!
> -----Original Message----- > From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org > [mailto:tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Roy Wallace > Sent: 08 December 2009 22:00 > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > Subject: Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > > > > I'm not one of those "wiki says it so you have to follow it" wonks. > > I'm one of those "wiki says it so you have to follow it or > fix it" wonks. > > > The whole thing is a big mess, > > Mmhmm. > > > and I have no idea how to solve it. > > One solution (which I'm thinking of adopting for the sake of my own > sanity) is to just map what's on the ground - so that's > path/surface/width/signage. I don't have a fancy law book so > I figure I should probably leave the legal stuff to someone else. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
