... not quite ... I now that page and have studied it well ... But try comparing that page with some of the others I cited in my previous long e-mail ... That's the dilemma that I don't think I'm alone in facing ...
Mike Harris > -----Original Message----- > From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org > [mailto:tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Roy Wallace > Sent: 09 December 2009 22:01 > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > Subject: Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no > > >> > So - question to the group - do people think that foot / > bicycle / > >> > etc. = yes / no / permissive etc. has any strictly legal > >> implication > >> > in their area / usage? > >> > >> Technically, yep, best to follow the wiki on this one. > > > > "follow the wiki" - yes, perhaps - but WHICH wiki ... See > my earlier > > long message on this sight pointing out (as if we didn't all know > > already!) that there are many ideas in the wiki that are not all > > mutually consistent or compatible. No surprise there ... > but hence my question ... > > Which wiki? Well, you're asking for the meaning of > access=yes/no, so look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
