On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Isn't this what Mike was referring to when he said "... access to > non-copyright information on legal status ... is reasonably available > in the public domain in England and Wales" ? So there are actually law books there that say "road so-and-so may be / may not be cycled on"? And are you supposed to carry that law book with you if you get to a new city to decide whether or not you are allowed to take that shortcut there? > Andre are you saying that bicycle=yes/no should *only* be used when > there is a corresponding sign on the ground? No, on the contrary. I think we should use whatever clue is available as to the intention of the road owner of what kind of transportation the road is meant for. But I do this with clues on and around the road itself. A sign to me is merely a very clear and (usually) definitive and unambiguous clue. As such, I see no need to give it a category of its own. -- André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
