... On the last point - could we even deprecate designated= - I find it confusing and redundant and always use designation = (see wiki pages) - but maybe this is wrong?
Mike Harris > -----Original Message----- > From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org > [mailto:tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Roy Wallace > Sent: 08 December 2009 10:21 > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > Subject: Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Richard Mann > <richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Are we edging towards: > > > > bicycle=yes|no|private|permissive|unknown - legal status > > > > designation=* - your local (national) name for the legal status > > > > > bicycle:defacto=prevented|forbidden|tolerated|discouraged|accepted|sup > > ported|established > > - the apparent practical status, which you can use or not use, > > depending on your personal standards of verifiability (and the > > evidence available) > > Definitely a step in the right direction, i.e. separating > "legal status" from "defacto status". > > I'd be tempted to also use bicycle:signed=yes/no to clarify when the > (legal?) status is derived from evidence on the ground as > opposed to a law book. > > By the way, it's a pity that "designation" > (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation) sounds > so much like "designated" > (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated)... > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
