On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier < netti...@stackingdwarves.net> wrote:
> On 01/15/2016 10:00 PM, Martin Leese wrote: > >> Andres Cabrera wrote: >> >>> Very interesting. >>> >>> I'm wondering if it's worth considering separating the order for >>> horizontal >>> vs. vertical (instead of a single unified order). >>> >> >> This mixed order scheme, specifying #H and >> #P, has the disadvantage that as a source >> leaves the horizontal, its sharpness degrades >> rapidly to that of the height-order. An >> alternative scheme, which does not have this >> problem, is "Complete mixed-order sets". This >> would also require two numbers to be specified, >> #H and #V, and is described at: >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed-order_Ambisonics#Complete_mixed-order_sets_.28.23H.23V.29 >> >> However, I don't know of anybody who has >> experience with decoding such sets. >> > > Fons's decoder can handle that, and iirc it comes with examples. This > scheme is particularly useful for stacked rings. My decoder toolbox handles mixed orders, both HP and HV schemes. https://bitbucket.org/ambidecodertoolbox/adt Aaron (hel...@ai.sri.com) Menlo Park, CA US -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160115/1334e2e1/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
