On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier <
netti...@stackingdwarves.net> wrote:

> On 01/15/2016 10:00 PM, Martin Leese wrote:
>
>> Andres Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>> Very interesting.
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if it's worth considering separating the order for
>>> horizontal
>>> vs. vertical (instead of a single unified order).
>>>
>>
>> This mixed order scheme, specifying #H and
>> #P, has the disadvantage that as a source
>> leaves the horizontal, its sharpness degrades
>> rapidly to that of the height-order.  An
>> alternative scheme, which does not have this
>> problem, is "Complete mixed-order sets".  This
>> would also require two numbers to be specified,
>> #H and #V, and is described at:
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed-order_Ambisonics#Complete_mixed-order_sets_.28.23H.23V.29
>>
>> However, I don't know of anybody who has
>> experience with decoding such sets.
>>
>
> Fons's decoder can handle that, and iirc it comes with examples. This
> scheme is particularly useful for stacked rings.



My decoder toolbox handles mixed orders, both HP and HV schemes.

  https://bitbucket.org/ambidecodertoolbox/adt

Aaron (hel...@ai.sri.com)
Menlo Park, CA  US
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160115/1334e2e1/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to