MJ, > SPI pledges to obey all OFTC decisions. Please do the same for the > debian project.
Frankly, I wouldn't vote to approve the OFTC wording the way it stands if they were applying to join today. It's too vague. However, since OFTC actually needs very little, if anything, from SPI on a month-to-month basis, I'm not proposing to change it on the principle of it-aint-broke-don't-fix-it. A request to "respect all Debian constitutional decisions" is pretty useless without a charter specifying how those decisions are going to be delivered to the board and how the board is supposed to know that they are legitimate. This is what I believe that Ian was trying to address. Actually, on the it-aint-broke-don't-fix-it front, what decision or question has AJ, or his predecessor, *not* relayed reliably to the Board? There's an implication on this thread that AJ is not trustworthy, and I have yet to see evidence of it. -- --Josh Berkus Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Project Core Team www.postgresql.org (all opinions expressed are my own; I do not speak for the Project unless specifically noted.) _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
