On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:01:00AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > (Confusing statements by the current DPL about his authoritativity > don't help, although he's also promised to relate faithfully any > non-DPL decisions, so that isn't critical ATM.)
I consider them different hats: - the DPL gets to make certain decisions on Debian's behalf as per the constitution - the Debian rep to SPI has to communicate all valid decisions from Debian to the SPI board - the Debian advisor to SPI should offer useful support and advice to the board to help the organisation be as successful as possible The first is a privilege, the second is a responsibility, the third is a bit of both. (I don't think "authoritative decisionmaker" is an accurate description of any of those roles) Cheers, aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
