On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:17:33PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >   6. Debian will appoint a project representative to SPI, who shall
> >      communicate decisions made by the project to the board, and serve
> >      as a single point of contact for the board to communicate with
> >      the project.
> I'm afraid that this fails to clarify precisely the situation that was
> being disputed.  What if the representative fails to honour some
> Debian GR ?  

Then that's something for Debian to resolve, up to and including
appointing a new project representative.

> Now obviously we expect them not to but the resolution
> should be written so that these cases are properly covered.

How is this any different to any other project having a representative
that doesn't pass on properly made decision?

Cheers,
aj

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general

Reply via email to