On 13 Jan 2004 at 10:29, Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > When something looks easily exploitable, 0 isn't as real deterrent for > improper use and assuming you aren't hitting a bunch of other SA rules, it > ought not be a problem for you.
I'd say that individual mail admins setting a positive value for a score which is meant to be negative isn't much of a deterrent against improper use of the Habeas SWE. Habeas litigating the pants off violators, on the other hand *does* appear to be a deterrent. :-) http://www.habeas.com/companyPressPR.html#victory1 "Under the terms of the stipulated judgment, Heller may not only not use the Habeas warrant mark, but he may not send unsolicited commercial or promotional messages of any type to anyone, anywhere on the Internet, even if the messages do not contain the Habeas mark. The judgment extends protection to all Internet users, domain owners, Internet service providers, and interactive computer services, providing penalties of up to $25,000 or more per incident if Heller violates the judgment." Nels Lindquist <*> ---- Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. Whatever is said in Latin, sounds profound. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
