> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Charles Gregory > Sent: 13 January 2004 15:29 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [WL] Re: [SAtalk] OT: forged habeus mark > <snip> > > What I *would* suggest, to help habeas win the fight, is > set-up a procmail > script that checks for mail which exceeds threshold > (excluding the habeas > test) but which has the watermark. This is most likely spam that has > abused the habeas mark. If we keep forwarding these fake > habeas marks to > habeas.com, it will be that much easier for habeas to prove massive > mis-use of its copyrighted material (which I think influences > the size of > damage awards!) and help them track down a sneaky spammer faster.
If the mailer is a legitimate habeas user then surely they won't be sending mail that would rate as spam anyway? So if the habeas test scores 0 it should make no difference. Just a thought. Alan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
