-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 13 January 2004 11:39, Brian May wrote: > Habeas is around to make sure email reaches its destination. SA uses > Habeas to push the score down, much like whitelisting. IF spammers use the > Habeas headers, and the message is in fact spam, they will be sued. Habeas > is used, much like white lists. They serve just about the same purpose. > > Not everyone uses the same default SA rules. I've sent out message that > my local SA flags as spam, when they are not. If I use the Habeas headers, > the message would not come close to being marked as spam, and being a false > positive. (Note: I do not currently use the habeas mark.. but will in the > future....) > > It is not in the spammers financial future to use the habeas mark..
How is the habeas marks people going to be in forced and make it work without being over run? There are so many spammers in many different countries. I have not seen one message that would have been a FP without habeas mark. They need to get there lawyers working. I consider the habeas mark has failed and is a waste of money. Douglas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFABFngSpWn8R0Z08URAms8AKCHQPd7WgowFWLPq9Q8I5+Q69zDawCgwqXc jNwF2dKkQGbcC6QtiPzKdMw= =znFN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
