> We're all seeing false negatives slip through from a spammer using the > Habeaus header, but I don't think 0 is the right score for the test. > I think it's still a valid negative score. > > Looking at my latest, if I give Habeas a -3.0, the false negative turns > positive. So I'm going to try that. > > Meanwhile, I've licensed the Habeas SWE mark myself, and it should be > included in this message. > > Now if only my colo provider wasn't listed in level 2 of SPEWS ... > <sigh> > > Mojo
I'm still completely puzzled why anyone who isn't a spammer would be interested in Habeas. Your message without the habeas scoring came in at -4.83. If I had habeas scoring turned on it would have been -12.83. Unless you're intending to offset positive scores from spam why bother with habeas? Gerry ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
