On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Zak McGregor wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 22:42:36 -0400 > Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I really like RPM also. I have made almost all of my packages > > including Razor2 agents and DCC (dccproc). I grab trusted src > > RPMs for Postfix and SA (thanks Theo) and --rebuild them on > > specific machines.
Same here. I had some not so nice experiences with the CPAN module updating and installing all kinds of modules (and perl), which I didn't want. It also is only useful if you just have one computer. Distributing the same setup on multiple machines is much easier with RPM and something like yum or apt. > 1 word (for all feeling a need to choose between CPAN & RPM): > cpan2rpm. Or another even better word: cpanflute2 (provided by RPM::Specfile), works a lot better in my opinion. christof -- Christof Damian xs03 ltd ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
