> On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 16:24, Daniel Kaliel wrote: >> I have been trying to find documentation on how to do this, but have >> not found any. I spoke with the partnership of my company on this and >> how it is safer not to, instead filtering email on there email client, >> however, they have decided to have all SPAM immediately deleted. So >> if anyone knows where I can find more info on how to do this, I would >> appreciate it. > > :0 > * ^X-Spam-Flag: YES > /dev/null > > However, this is probably the single most efficient way to shoot > yourself in the foot with any spam filter.
The best solution is to reject the mail at the smtp level, and then save it to a central queue. This is the method I use, perhaps 1 in a few thousand messages I have to recover. I just delete messages from the queue after 2 weeks. Don't just delete. At the very worse, reject the message at the smtp level, then the sender can realize the mail has been rejected. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com. Did you know that Dice has over 25,000 tech jobs available today? From careers in IT to Engineering to Tech Sales, Dice has tech jobs from the best hiring companies. http://www.dice.com/index.epl?rel_code=104 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk