On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:24:55AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote: ... > Certainly my initial impression after 24 hours is that DCC is the most > effective, followed by RAZOR2, followed by PYZOR. All together is probably > most effective of course, so long as the false positives of all three dont > accumulate enough to register as spam.
I've got a similar impression with my corpuses here, the DCC hit rate appears higher than razor. One big advantage is you can run your own DCC server and don't have to rely on the wonderful folks who do an excellent job keeping the razor servers up (most of the time.)
Well, I found razor had higher hits, but DCC gets more points, and I found that DCC hit more often on those hard-to-detect spams that otherwise score just below the threshold...
Regards, Simon
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
