On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:24:55AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote: > Hmm, you've got me a little bit worried there, but where do you get the > idea that DCC "deliberately includes legitimate newsletters" ? I've seen
DCC is a bulk detector, not a spam detector.
> And when you say DCC doesn't measure how "spam-like" a message is, I
> wasn't aware that Razor2 or Pyzor did either ? All three rely on
Sure they do. Razor2 and Pyzor are meant to report spam, DCC isn't
(although most everything reported to them is spam... hence it's score.)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"The mind of the beginner is empty, free of the habits of the expert,
ready to accept, to doubt, and open to all the possibilities."
- Shunryu Suzuki
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
