Jim Ford wrote:

Now I've got SA working well (thanks NG!), I'd really like to do something
to hit or at least cause some inconvenience to spammers, rather than just
passively dump spam. Devin Carraway's Sugarplum spam poisoner look an
interesting option, does anyone use it or have opinions on it, please?

"A Bad Idea." Anything that generates stupidly-based extra traffic with no legitimate purpose on the Internet is "A Bad Idea." Joe jobs are already bad enough.


If you have the bandwidth and if you really want to satisfy your ego, consider teergrubing/tar pitting using an appropriate MTA such as Exim 4, SA-Exim 3.0, Postfix 2.0 or suchlike.

I settle for smtp 550 refusals of spam topping a reasonably high SA score - after checking with my ISP that his having to put up with no-bounce-address messages was o.k. with him.

Best,

Tony

--
Tony Earnshaw

There's none so daft as them as will not learn

http://j-walk.com/blog/docs/conference.htm
http://www.billy.demon.nl
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:  Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to