ie: if I explicitly set a reply-to of myself because I wanted private replies, and the list over-wrote that, I'd be a bit bent outa shape. That's nothing short of broken behavior by the list. However if I don't have one present at all, it seems reasonable for the list to add one. (Although I would admitt, I currently prefer getting two copies like I do now..)
The only drawback is on "tech supportish" mailing lists where a some of the posters aren't subscribed.. like here on saTalk (look around for requests to be directly cc'ed.. there's a noticeable number of em.. makes me wonder how many of the one-time posters didn't think to ask for such treatment but need it)
At 06:30 PM 12/13/2002 +0100, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
Exactly, which is why I, on my own lists, always set a reply-to to the list if
there's no reply-to set already; meaning that unless the sender says otherwise
the reply goes to the list, just as he wants it to.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
